Table 2 Intervention fidelity and experience descriptives

  0

14.2 (15/106)

14.8 (9/61)

13.3 (6/45)

p = .33^a

  1

3.8 (4/106)

6.6 (4/61)

0 (0/45)

  2

18.9 (20/106)

19.7 (12/61)

17.8 (8/45)

  3

63.2 (67/106)

59 (36/61)

68.9 (31/45)

 Continuity of representation at workshops—% yes

79.3 (69/87)

81.3 (39/48)

76.9 (30/39)

p = .41^b

 Interteam activities delivered (workshop 2)—% yes

81.7 (67/82)

68.8 (33/48)

100 (34/34)

p = .00^b

 Interteam activities delivered (workshop 3)—% yes

80.6 (58/72)

72.2 (26/36)

88.9 (32/36)

p = .07^b

  % agree

30.8 (28/91)

38.5 (20/52)

20.5 (8/39)

p = .06^b

  % strongly agree

69.2 (63/91)

61.5 (32/52)

79.5 (31/39)

 % of teams that defined an appropriate goal at close of workshop 1

92.5 (74/80)

98 (48/49)

83.9 (26/31)

p = .03^b

 % of teams that defined strategies for goal attainment at close of workshop 1

97.5 (78/80)

100 (49/49)

93.5 (29/31)

p = .15^b

 % of teams that defined measures for tracking goal progress at close of workshop 1

85 (68/80)

89.8 (44/49)

77.4 (24/31)

p = .12^b

 % of teams that completed preworkshop 1 exercise

98.9 (90/91)

100 (52/52)

97.4 (38/39)

p = .43^b

 % of teams that measured impact of changes designed to improve formal team communications at workshop 2

67.1 (55/82)

66.7 (32/48)

67.6 (23/34)

p = .56^b

  < 1

39.7 (25/63)

61.8 (21/34)

13.8 (4/29)

p = .00^a

  1–2

44.4 (28/63)

35.3 (12/34)

55.2 (16/29)

  3+

15.9 (10/63)

2.9 (1/34)

31.0 (9/29)

 % of teams rated as higher enactment at workshop 3

61.4 (44/72)

55.6 (20/36)

66.7 (24/36)

p = .23^b

Perceived intervention value

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

 Value of workshop 1 material

4.43 (0.50)

4.36 (0.51)

4.51 (0.48)

p = .132^c

 Value of workshop 1 interteam/researcher interactions

4.49 (0.53)

4.39 (0.59)

4.63 (0.43)

p = .069^c

 Value of workshop 2

4.53 (0.48)

4.33 (0.47)

4.78 (0.35)

p = .000^c

 Value of workshop 3

4.52 (0.48)

4.25 (0.46)

4.78 (0.34)

p = .000^c