Can a multicomponent multidisciplinary implementation package change physicians’ and nurses’ perceptions and practices regarding thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke? An exploratory analysis of a cluster-randomized trial

Table 3 Effect of intervention on domain 1 score = performance indicator, feedback and training

	Intervention group		Control group		Intervention vs. control group^a,b; p value
	Pre-intervention (Mean ± SD)	Post-intervention (Mean ± SD)	Pre-intervention (Mean ± SD)	Post-intervention (Mean ± SD)
Overall
	2.95 ± 0.48	3.17 ± 0.47	3.03 ± 0.50	3.02 ± 0.46	0.21 (0.09; 0.34)**; 0.001
Location
Metropolitan	3.07 ± 0.52	3.21 ± 0.47	3.04 ± 0.50	3.03 ± 0.49	0.15 (− 0.07; 0.37); 0.175
Non-metropolitan	2.83 ± 0.40	3.11 ± 0.47	2.99 ± 0.51	2.99 ± 0.41	0.26 (0.17; 0.35)***; 0.000
Job role
Physician	2.94 ± 0.41	3.05 ± 0.45	2.99 ± 0.51	2.96 ± 0.41	0.12 (− 0.08; 0.31); 0.243
Nurse	2.95 ± 0.50	3.19 ± 0.47	3.07 ± 0.48	3.05 ± 0.46	0.25 (0.06; 0.44)*; 0.010

*p value < 0.05 considered as significant
**p value < 0.01 considered as significant
***p value < 0.001 considered as significant
^aChange from pre-intervention to post-intervention survey
^bLinear mixed model controlled for category based on baseline thrombolysis rate

ISSN: 1748-5908