Table 2 Measures deployed in study by domain, construct, concept, aim, who/how measured, and who collects
Framework | Construct | Concept(s) | Aim(s) | Who measured | How measured | Collector |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Inner setting | Readiness for Implementation | Leadership engagement | 5 | Sites | ILS | Project manager |
Readiness to implement | ORC | |||||
Size of site waiver agency | Administrative data 2018 | – | ||||
Quality scores | Quality data | |||||
Individual:site and person | Demographics | Site: number of employees/beneficiaries, quality scores, cost | – | Sites | Administrative data 2018 | |
Clinician: age, race, sex, discipline, degree, years of experience as clinician and in WA | Clinician | Survey | Project manager | |||
Beneficiary: age, sex, race | Beneficiary | MDS-HC | – | |||
Clinician: engagement | Attitude, self-efficacy | 2 | Clinician | 1. EBPAS 2. GSE | Project manager | |
Beneficiary outcomes | ADLs, IADLs falls, pain, depression/ED/hospital | 3 and 4 | Beneficiary | MDS-HC | – | |
Process | Training | Knowledge with intervention | 2 | Clinician | Survey | Project manager |
Knowledge with IF/EF | IF/EF | |||||
Team building | Interdisciplinary coordination | Beneficiary | EHR progress notes | – | ||
Coalition building | Occurrence/type | IF | Data tool | – | ||
Inner setting | Adoption | Fidelity to training | 1 and 2 | Clinician | Type, date, number done | Project manager |
Fidelity to IF/EF | IF/EF | IF data tool | Research assistants | |||
Fidelity to intervention | Beneficiary/patient | EHR care plan | – | |||
Sustainability | Fidelity to change | Sites | SIC | Research assistants | ||
Acceptability | Satisfaction with training | 6 | Clinician IF EF | Survey | Project manager | |
Cost | Dollars expended | 6 | Clinician IF EF beneficiary | Wages, benefits | Project manager | |
Outer setting | Policy | Payment for incentive | 6 | CMS contract | Contract 1 October 2022 | Project manager |