Correlation with changes in HH compliance in all study groups | Â | Â |
---|---|---|
Component | Δ T1 to T2 | Δ T1 to T3 |
Proposition | S rho (p value) | S rho (p value) |
Performance feedback | .315 (.015*) | .347 (.007**) |
I do know my ward’s HH performance. |  |  |
Social influence | Â | .381 (.003**) |
My colleagues support each other in performing HH. | Â | Â |
Our team members address each other in case of undesirable HH behaviour. | Â | .414 (.001**) |
Leadership | Â | .293 (.025*) |
My manager pays regular attention to the adherence of HH guidelines. | Â | Â |
HH is not a priority at our ward. | Â | .261 (.046*) |
My ward manager addresses barriers to enable HH as recommended. | Â | .319 (.014*) |
My ward manager holds team members accountable for HH performance. | Â | .382 (.003**) |
My ward manager encourages and motivates our team members to perform HH. | Â | .352 (.006**) |
Correlation with changes in HH compliance within SAS †|  |  |
Education | -.315 (.042*) | Â |
I know exactly when to perform HH. | Â | Â |
Leadership | Â | .387 (.011*) |
My ward manager encourages and motivates our team members to perform HH. | Â | Â |
My ward manager holds team members accountable for HH performance. | Â | .398 (.009**) |
Social influence | Â | . |
Our team members address each other in case of undesirable HH behaviour. | Â | .347 (.025*) |