Peer Review reports
From: Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 Aug 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 7 Sep 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Amber Watt |
| 10 Sep 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alun Cameron |
| 10 Sep 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Shekelle |
| 15 Jan 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Rebecca Ganann |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 15 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 24 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alun Cameron |
| 27 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Shekelle |
| 28 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Amber Watt |
| 24 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Rebecca Ganann |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 24 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 25 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Rebecca Ganann |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 25 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 12 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Rebecca Ganann |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 12 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 16 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Rebecca Ganann |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 16 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 19 Jul 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 19 Jul 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1748-5908-5-56 |
You can find further information about peer review here.