Table 3 Program model for the comparative case analysis
Program model elements | Components |
|---|---|
Innovation [17] | The clinical question upon which the project was based |
Style of report [7] | Design of the report, co-creation of report design with CPLP and physician leads from participating groups |
Available gold standard/benchmark for the clinical question [7] | |
 Recipients [17] | Who participants were and how they interacted with one another [7, 17, 23] |
 Context [17] | Project origin/history Group dynamic (collegiality/culture) and leadership involvement in the sessions [23] Pre-work/relationship building between PLP and participant group [25] Co-creation of data/metrics [7] Proximity of doctor to data/patient (perceived control) [23] |
CPLP led or co-facilitated with a participant physician-lead Coaching-oriented facilitation [25] | |
 Physician engagement/change talk/change planning [8] | Interactivity of the AGFS, extent of change talk |
 Outputs | Further project development with CPLP Emergence of autonomous data reporting by the physician group (dashboards) Measured/reported behavior change by the physicians |